DraftVerify Trust Every Pour.
DraftVerify Standards Library · F-33

Compliance Audit Framework

Version 1.0 · Publication Date: 2025-01-01 · Status: Active
© 2025 DraftVerify™ Standards Initiative. All rights reserved.

F-33 defines the auditing framework used to evaluate compliance with the DraftVerify Standard across breweries, distributors, and venues.
The goal is to ensure identity integrity, safety, traceability, and operational accuracy throughout the NA draft supply chain.

This framework establishes:

  • Audit types
  • Scoring structure
  • Required documentation
  • Field inspection procedures
  • Non-compliance categories
  • Corrective action timelines

F-33 works in conjunction with F-31 (Audit Log Framework) and F-37 (Field Audit Handbook).


1. Purpose of the Audit Framework

F-33 provides:

  • A consistent evaluation method
  • A measurable compliance score
  • Clear requirements for certification (F-32)
  • Evidence for incident investigation (F-22)
  • Accountability across the entire identity chain

Audits ensure that DraftVerify remains a trusted, defensible, and enforceable standard.


2. Audit Types

2.1 Brewery Audit

Evaluates:

  • Serialization accuracy (F-12)
  • Activation workflow (F-13)
  • Physical keg identification (F-6)
  • Documentation completeness (F-14)
  • Correct use of the Mark (F-32)

2.2 Distributor Audit

Evaluates:

  • Receiving & verification (F-15, F-17)
  • Transport separation (F-16)
  • Warehouse organization
  • Delivery verification with venues
  • Discrepancy handling

2.3 Venue Audit

Evaluates:

  • Correct NA separation
  • Line and faucet identification (F-8, F-9)
  • Daily/weekly checklists (F-19)
  • Tag scanning practices
  • Compliance with product switching protocol (F-39)

2.4 Special Audit

Triggered by:

  • Incidents or suspected mis-serves
  • Compliance complaints
  • Significant organizational changes
  • New system installations

3. Audit Scoring Structure

Each audit is scored across five weighted categories:

Category Weight Description
Identity Accuracy 30% Tags, labels, and identity mappings must be correct and consistent.
Verification Discipline 25% Required scans and checks must be performed consistently.
Separation Integrity 20% NA must remain separated throughout all workflows.
Documentation & Logs 15% Accurate and complete logs per F-31, F-14, F-17, F-19.
Training & Procedures 10% Staff must know and follow DraftVerify requirements.

Passing Score: 85%
Conditional Pass: 70–84% (requires corrective actions)
Fail: Below 70%


4. Required Documentation for Audit

Operators must supply:

  • Activation logs (F-13)
  • Serialization records (F-12)
  • Distribution logs (F-17)
  • Venue checklists (F-19)
  • Incident reports (F-22)
  • Audit logs (F-31)
  • System diagrams (F-24)
  • Training records (F-23)

Missing documentation is an automatic deduction.


5. Field Inspection Procedure

Auditors perform:

5.1 Physical Inspection

  • Keg collars
  • Coupler Tags
  • Line Tags
  • Faucet markers
  • Cooler organization
  • Transport racks (for distributors)

5.2 Live Verification Tests

Auditor may request:

  • Live NFC scans
  • Product switching demonstration
  • Identity reconciliation
  • Review of active DTI(s)

5.3 Staff Interviews

Auditor confirms:

  • Understanding of verification workflow
  • NA separation rules
  • Incident escalation steps

5.4 Documentation Review

Auditor checks:

  • Checklist consistency
  • Missing or late entries
  • Evidence of corrective actions

6. Non-Compliance Categories

Non-compliance is categorized as:

6.1 Critical Non-Compliance (Immediate Failure)

Examples:

  • Wrong keg tapped → NA mis-serve
  • Missing Coupler Tag
  • Broken NA separation
  • Tampering or falsified records

Requires immediate corrective action and possible suspension.

6.2 Major Non-Compliance

Examples:

  • Inconsistent verification scans
  • Outdated or missing documentation
  • Incorrect identity mapping
  • Repeated minor issues

Requires corrective action within 14 days.

6.3 Minor Non-Compliance

Examples:

  • Label wear
  • Temporary cooler organization issues
  • Minor procedural lapses

Correctable within 30 days.


7. Corrective Action Requirements

Operators must submit:

  • A written corrective action plan
  • Implementation timeline
  • Supporting evidence
  • Follow-up verification scans

Failure to implement corrective actions may lead to:

  • Loss of certification (F-32)
  • Mandatory re-audit
  • Public delisting from DraftVerify registry

8. Audit Frequency

Breweries

  • Annual
  • Additional audits after major system changes

Distributors

  • Annual + random spot audits

Venues

  • Annual
  • Special audits after incidents or complaints

Multi-Venue Groups (F-34)

  • Central audit plus spot checks across sites

9. Integration With Other Standards

F-33 is directly linked to:

  • F-31 — Audit Log & Traceability Framework
  • F-32 — Certification Policy
  • F-37 — Field Audit Handbook
  • F-18 — Venue Setup & Verification Protocol
  • F-39 — Product Switching Protocol

Audits rely on the logs, workflows, and identity structures defined elsewhere.


10. Summary

F-33 establishes the official audit structure used to verify DraftVerify compliance across the full supply chain.
It ensures:

  • Identity integrity
  • NA separation
  • Reliable verification practices
  • Strong documentation and training
  • Accountability at every step

This framework protects consumers, reinforces standardization, and maintains the credibility of DraftVerify Certification worldwide.